How do I know when it’s time to break up?

Facilitator reads for framing:

Since October 7th and the ongoing war with Israel/Hamas, the world has physically and emotionally felt like it is on fire. Our social media feeds are inundated with triggering images and the rhetoric on the street feels inflamed. Trusted relationships that we have held dear now seem a bit tenuous, and we may no longer feel that we are able to trust the people we thought we could. Being in relationship with people that we perceive as different from us, is feeling particularly hard at this moment.

• With all the noise and the vitriolic rhetoric, how do I know whether I should stay in a relationship or break up? The break-up could be on an individual level or a group level, unsubscribing from a newsletter or unfollowing a social media account. And if I don’t break up, then how do I stay in a relationship while also defending my own authentic needs at this moment?

Facilitator reads for framing:

Exploring these questions through the value of authenticity can offer layering to the many relationships that are tested through holding diverse viewpoints.

Authenticity is often described as the quality of being real or true to oneself and acting in accordance with desires, motives, ideals or beliefs that express who you really are. As our world has been turned upside down and our new reality is brimming with contradictions and uncertainties, some of our truths have been shattered. At the same time, other truths have emerged, and some of us have come closer to discovering our evolving authentic selves in this moment. All of this impacts our boundaries within relationships.

Being in relationships requires us to make a collection of choices every day. It is about the choice to show up and be real – the choice to be honest to let our true selves be seen.

THE FOUR HORSEMEN:

Facilitator reads for framing:

Often, crisis events force us to confront our convictions, and through introspection we claim our personal truths. When it comes to sharing them with others, though, we can hold ourselves back from giving those ideas life.

In 1983, Dr. John Gottman of the Gottman Institute designed a “love lab” where he observed how couples interacted and approached conflict. During his study, Gottman separated all couples into two groups: He called one group the masters of relationships; the other group was the disasters. The disasters of relationships had four behaviors in common, and he labeled these the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse.

Dr. Gottman conducted additional research where he predicted break-up with 90% accuracy based on the first three minutes of a conversation. What he noticed was that couples who started their conflict conversation with criticism and elicited defensiveness in their partner ended up breaking up vs. couples who used gentle start-ups or began their conversation expressing their feelings and needs.

Facilitator reads for framing:

In Jewish tradition, the Te’naim is an engagement ceremony created in 12th Century Europe.

During the celebration, the families signed a contract that was witnessed and read out loud to the community. This document set the date for the wedding and outlined the pre-marriage obligations of each family regarding the dowry, gifts, plus other financial and logistical matters. Although the contract wasn’t legally binding, like the ketubah (marriage contract), it was a symbolic way of recognizing what each person was committing to bringing to the relationship. And if either family went back on their word, there were consequences.

Today, some couples supplement the traditional Te’naim ceremony and articulate personal conditions and concerns — both current and future — that express their love, trust, shared values and commitment to the marriage.